`LANDLORDISM HAS CAUSED THE HOUSING CRISIS¬

 

`Ban social homes until Right to Buy is scrapped`

Nick Bano, barrister and author says in an article in Inside Housing: “While the Right to Buy still exists and while land prices are so high because of landlordism, it’s kind of impossible and makes no sense to build social housing."

 

 When  Mr Bano released his book Against Landlords earlier this year, it proved controversial across the political spectrum. The article goes on:

The argument that has caused such controversy is that private landlordism, rather than housing supply, has resulted in the housing crisis in Britain. Mr Bano says the  Right to Buy scheme and deregulation of the private rental sector in the 1980s have resulted in a proliferation of private landlords.

There are now 2.5 million of them – one in 21 of the population – receiving a combined £63bn per year in rent. This has resulted in the extortionate housing costs faced by people in Britain today, he argues. 

Although Mr Bano spends his time representing homeless people, residential occupiers and destitute households in court, the book’s arguments followed from the cases he was unable to take on.

“We only do cases that are eligible to be funded, and private rented cases almost never are, because you can almost never win, so I hardly ever represent private renters,” he explains

But even for someone who argues in court for a living, presenting his arguments to the court of public opinion has been a revealing experience.

“I’m only just realising how all this works, but I think some of my statements on building have probably been a bit more strident than my actual views are. They’ve been a bit provocative or they’ve been misinterpreted,” he says.

He wrote an article in The Guardian before the book was published, summarising his arguments. “I didn’t say we must never lay a single brick as long as we live. We need to keep up with population growth.

When it comes to social homes, Mr Bano argues that supply is an issue, but the solution is not necessarily building more.

“It depends what you mean by supply,” he says. “If the question is ‘do we need to build a lot more houses?’, the answer is probably ‘no’. If the question is ‘do we need a lot more social housing?’, the answer is ‘yes’.

“It’s not the same question, because you could easily repurpose housing into social housing.”

Mr Bano considers many social homes to be playing a different economic role thanks to Right to Buy and the ability of private landlords to make personal profit from homes that were built to be socially productive.

“The state paid for millions of homes in this city [London]. They paid for that once, then it was sold off at a discount. They paid for it again, then they’ve been paying it off in the form of housing benefits. Now they’re paying it off in the form of temporary accommodation rents.

“Soon they will pay for it again, in the form of acquiring back a lot of the old stock.

“Not only has the state spent many more times than it should have on these homes, but all of that money has simply been transferred to landlords.”

Mr Bano emphasises that, without landlordism, that money could have been reinvested in the quality of social housing or in public services.

“I found that I was playing the role of the ultimate nimby, the platonic ideal of an anti-building guy, and in a way that serves a useful purpose. But it wasn’t what I set out to do”

Even if more social homes were needed in Britain,Mr Bano cannot see the point of laying more bricks until the legacy of Margaret Thatcher’s housing laws are undone.

“If I were running a nice council, I would not particularly want to build council housing,” he reflects. “We can see that newly built social houses in Norwich are being sold off after just a few years.

“Imagine the amount of public investment that has been put into that scheme, and it just gets sold off."

Community Voice Carlisle is published by Carlisle Tenants` and Residents` Federation. For information about the federation, ring 01228 522277.