Tuesday 20 February 2018

EDITOR URGED:YOU MUST REVEAL THE LOT




Newspaper readers also
`kept in the dark`


A newspaper editor is accused of keeping readers in the dark because he is not publishing the full facts about a  Cumbria housing association merger.

The editor of the Carlisle daily, the News and Star is accused of failing to inform his readers of the full facts of the merger between Workington-based Impact Housing Association and the Liverpool-based Riverside Housing Association

"Until his paper prints the full facts, he is keeping readers in the dark” says a spokesman for the campaigning group, Carlisle Tenants` and Residents Federation.

The Federation has told the editor in a letter that there had been a lot of  secrecy by the two associations previously about the merger. Keeping readers in the dark added to that secrecy.

The Federation has written to the editor. The letter dated February  12,  is reproduced here:

“Dear Editor

“I am writing about the letter to the editor dated January 22 (it also appeared on the same day on this blog ) which has not been published.

“In the view of the Federation it is important that this letter is published or some other means be found to inform your readers that your story of January 10 needed fuller explanation.

“The Federation has a long history of campaigning against Riverside Housing Associaton and as part of that campaigning we investigated the planned merger of Impact and Riverside.

“The  investigation found that the News and Star story was not sufficiently adequate and also that there were serious allegations of secrecy and of witholding information from the public which had been made against the two associations and against the regulatory body. 

“It has also been reported that following news of the planned merger, concerns have  been expressed about the fate of the Oval community centre at Workington. It has also been reported following news of the planned merger, that tenants on Salterbeck Estate ,Workington are  concerned about the lack of information.

Chris Story
CHRIS STORY..."a possible news story? "


“Your newspaper initially correctly identified the planned merger as of public interest and since my letter, your associate editor Chris Story has shown an interest and indictated that you are possibly interested in a news story about  all the issues involved.

 “The Federation now asks in view of the continued public interest in this matter what steps are being taken by your newspaper to look into these matters and if necessary inform the public of the full story?”


  Carlisle Tenants` and Residents` Federation publishes this blog. Information about the Federation is available on 01228 522277 or 01228 532803



Wednesday 14 February 2018

EX-CHAIRMAN WAITE RETURNS TO THE ATTACK

Worried tenants
`kept in
the dark`
“Natali Noir” at ViewBugThe row about the Cumbria merger of two housing associations rumbles on. An appalling lack of information about the merger continues to fuel  the row with continued claims of secrecy about what exactly is going on.

There is a lack of information for tenants of the two associations, Workington-based Impact and Liverpool-based Riverside.

There is a lack of information for local councillors and MPs from Homes England, the public body  responsible for regulating the two associations . 

And a lack of information for the public from the local  newspaper, the Carlisle–based daily publication, the News and Star.

Tackling the secrecy issue is Appleby-based Adrian Waite a former chairman of Impact and now a leading management consultant .He has a newsletter and a blog and writes in his capacity as managing director of AWICS, a management and training company.

Extracts from Mr Waite`s blog were published last week in the previous post of Community Voice Carlisle. Newly published posts from Mr Waite`s blog have more to say about the planned merger and go some way to addressing the lack of information.But he also raises other serious issues.

Here is what Adrian Waite has to say:

“In recent blogs and newsletters, I have written about the proposed takeover of Impact Housing Association by the Riverside Group. Until 2015, I was Chair of Impact and I continue to be a shareholding member. I am hearing that tenants and others are concerned about the lack of transparency in this process. I understand that:

  • Tenants in Salterbeck (Impact’s largest estate in Workington) are concerned with the lack of information.
  •  
  • There are concerns about the fate of the Oval Centre(pictured above) a community centre  in Salterbeck that provides a range of services and that is operated and funded by Impact.
  •  Tenants are concerned that Impact may end up as a subsidiary of Riverside rather than an equal partner in a merger.
  • Local authorities, councillors and members of Parliament are having difficulty in establishing what is happening.

“In the absence of information from Impact or Riverside, I would like to offer my own thoughts.

“I don’t think anyone could accurately describe what is proposed as a merger. Impact has about 3,000 houses and Riverside has about 50,000 houses and is the fifth biggest housing association in the United Kingdom. Impact has a non-compliant grading with Homes England while Riverside has a compliant grading. This is clearly a takeover.


“I am told that:

  • Impact prepared a specification of what it wanted and that tenants were involved in this. I do not know which tenants or how they were involved. I do not know what the specification said.
  • Impact approached five housing associations and asked them to make proposals. I do not know which they were (other than Riverside) or how they were chosen. I am told that confidentiality agreements were signed that prevent Impact from divulging who they were.
  • Impact found that Riverside provided the best match for what they wanted but I don’t know anything about what they proposed.
  • Negotiations are now in progress between Impact and Riverside.

“I doubt if Impact would become a subsidiary of Riverside. Riverside does not appear to be organised based on geographical areas. Their subsidiaries are joint ventures and for-profit subsidiaries with all affordable homes in a single subsidiary.


“The benefit of the takeover of Impact from Riverside’s point of view would probably be to integrate Impact’s properties into the management arrangements that they already have in Cumbria that are focused on the ex-Carlisle City Council properties that they own.


“In fact, Carlisle provides a useful case study of how Riverside operate. Carlisle City Council transferred their stock into a stand-alone housing association – Carlisle Housing Association. This was later absorbed into the Riverside Group and lost its identity.

It`s Christmas....party time at Salterbeck Estate Workington
“I also doubt if Salterbeck Oval would fit into the Riverside business model. Whereas Impact are a member of the place shapers’ group of housing associations whose vision is to support communities as well as to let housing, Riverside is not and tends to focus on providing housing – an approach that seems to be favoured by Ministers. 

When I was Chair of Impact, we found it necessary to subsidise the Oval and I don’t think it would fit with Riverside’s business model to do that.

“Of course, Riverside and Impact may be working on an agreement that would include local governance arrangements and the continued operation of the Oval. 

However, none of these commitments by housing associations are binding for ever and after a few years arrangements can be changed. There is currently a trend to ‘collapse’ group structures.

 For example, I was recently involved with Community Trust Housing that was a subsidiary of Network Housing in Stockwell Park, London. 

They were wound up by the parent association and their stock absorbed into Network. Similarly, commitments to continue services are usually time limited.

“I am not saying that the takeover should not happen, but I am saying that the process should be honest and transparent and shareholding members, tenants, councillors and local communities should know exactly what is being proposed.



Image result for ADRIAN WAITE
ADRIAN WAITE..."my own views"
 I am not alone in this view. For example, a local councillor has contacted me to say that:
“`I certainly think that shareholders and tenants need to be given better information than they appear to be getting.`

“I have spoken to Homes England and they assure me that the takeover cannot go ahead without the approval of the shareholding members. Impact has had a long-standing policy of encouraging tenants and others in the local community to become shareholding members. 

"It only costs £1 and should ensure a say in the takeover. I would advise tenants and anyone else with an interest in Impact to apply to join.

“I will continue to keep readers of this blog and of the ‘AWICS Housing News’ informed of developments at Impact Housing"

READERS CAN ACCESS ADRIAN WAITE`S BLOG BY GOOGLING AWICS

 Carlisle Tenants` and Residents` Federation publishes this blog. Information about the Federation is available on 01228 522277 or 01228 532803

Wednesday 7 February 2018

YES, YET ANOTHER VERSION OF PLANNED HOUSING MERGER





Ex-chairman Waite and secrecy allegations







The mystery deepens as a third version emerges of the planned Cumbria merger of two housing associations - Impact and  Riverside. Version Number Three comes from Adrian Waite, a former chairman of Impact and now a leading management consultant.

Mr Waite talks darkly of secrecy and makes an accusation of withholding information from the public.

Accusations like this are nothing new to  those who for years have campaigned against Liverpool-based Riverside, notorious for its pronouncements which  make maximum  use of spin, gobledygook and obfuscation.

Riverside  has 50,000 homes  nationwide, 6,000 of them in Carlisle.Workington-based Impact has 2,700   homes.
Ex-chairman and shareholder Adrian Waite

Mr Waite`s version  follows an ever-so-friendly-cosy- get-together-version in the Carlisle newspaper, the News and Star and a version in the national  social housing magazine Inside Housing which pulled no punches in harsh criticism of Impact saying it was downgraded by the social housing regulator(the Homes and Communities Agency) for both its governance and  financial viability.

Mr Waite`s secrecy accusations are directed at Impact and the Homes and Communities Agency.

Mr Waite is managing director of AWICS, a management and training company based at Appleby specialising in giving support to local government and housing.

This is what he says in his web site about the planned merger:

It appears to me that whole process from the In-Depth Assessment to the proposed Merger has been shrouded in secrecy and neither Impact Housing Association nor the Homes & Communities Agency (now rebranded as Homes England) appear willing to provide much information to the public, the tenants or even Impact Housing Association’s shareholding members (of whom I am one)”
  
Mr Waite goes on:
“I have therefore carried out my own investigation during which I have spoken with current and previous board members, senior staff, staff of Homes England and others in the community. Some conversations have been ‘on the record’ while others have been ‘off the record’. What I have discovered is very interesting, not only from the point of view of people who are concerned about the future of Impact Housing Association and the communities that it serves, but also for anyone who is concerned about the governance, viability and regulation of Housing.”
Readers of this blog who wish to read a fuller version of what Mr Waite has to say should google AWICS.
Readers of the News and Star will have to be content with the ever-so-cosy-version of the planned merger. A letter to the editor of the News and Star dated January 22, and copied on the same day on an earlier post of this blog  drawing attention to the different versions of the planned merger, has yet to be published    


Carlisle Tenants` and Residents` Federation publishes this blog. Information about the Federation is available on 01228 522277 or 01228 532803