Riverside
danger after
the Corbyn
attacks
Jeremy Corbyn(left) joined the battle
this weekend as attacks on Riverside Housing Association continued unabated.
The Labour leader did not mention
Riverside by name but his speech at Nottingham clearly had organisations like
Riverside in mind when he said that Labour aims to reverse years of forced
privatisations.
The forced privatisation of Carlisle`s 6,000 council houses was planned
and engineered in Whitehall 14 years ago
by Mr John Prescott, then Tony Blair`s
Community Secretary. Today, while Mr Corbyn attacks such privatisations,
similar attacks are made by Carlisle City
councillor Ray Bloxham who played a leading
part in the actual handover process of the houses to Liverpool-based Riverside in 2002.
Councillor Bloxham`s attacks are
very significant. He speaks with a lifetime experience of work in social
housing. He also knows at first hand about Riverside`s sixty suffering tenants
in ice-box homes at Longtown caused by
that organisation`s dodgy boilers. He knows because he represents that town on
the city council .
From being an enthusiast for Riverside, Councillor Bloxham is now a disillusioned
critic.This may be considered surprising because as a Conservative he is
politically the opposite of Jeremy Corbyn.
This what Councillor Bloxham said following Riverside`s decision last
week to scrap its vital Carelne service
for the elderly and vulnerable in order to save money:
Coun. Bloxham.." I despair..." |
“I despair of Riverside because when we handed over the housing stock to
them, we did so because they were community minded.
“I don`t like their dictatorial
attitude. This is no way to treat people. Riverside should not be in the
housing business if they cannot talk to people”
Not community minded. Dictatorial in dealing with people.This is what
Councillor Bloxham says and it is exactly what has been said for 14 years by critics
of Riverside led by Carlisle Tenants and Residents` Federation.
Councillor Bloxham with his detailed knowledge of Riverside`s suffering Longtown tenanrs, could have added something else. That is that
Riverside is organised in ramshackle way and is grossly inefficient.
Riverside`s dictatorial decision about Careline contrasts markedly with
many other housing associations.These associations are doing ground-breaking
work for their tenants and others.
Gentoo Housing Association of Sunderland is one of these. Its work was
described in a recent post on this blog.( See Carol Matthews and an organisation put to shame).
Gentoo`s outstanding work is
hopefully to be the subject of discussion by the city council later this month
following questions submitted for oral answer by thecouncil`s Community
Overview and Scrutiny Panel. The submiited questions are:
QUESTION
ONE
“Carlisle
Tenants` and Residents` Federation welcomes the Panel`s decision to invite
other housing associations to take part in those of its hearings when reports
from Riverside Housing Association are discussed. The Federation asks if this
wider discussion can please be extended to other housing associations, particularly
those associations which are doing ground-breaking work for their tenants and others, and who unlike many associations are not
principally motivated by profit and the desire to boost their financial reserves.
“Gentoo
Housing Association based in Sunderland
is a good example of these ground-breaking associations. It is running a
pilot scheme jointly with the NHS,
targeting fuel-inefficient homes occupied by people - irrespective of any
connection they might have or might not have with Gentoo - who have respiratory
problems likely to be worsened by cold and damp, These people are given a boiler on prescription by the NHS. The
prescription comprises a new boiler and
insulation work including double-glazing, supplied by Gentoo.
“In the first six months of the pilot scheme, GP
appointments were reduced by 28% and
outpatient appointments by 33%. Tenants’ energy bills were reduced by a third
on average and the scheme has saved the NHS many thousands of pounds”.
QUESTION
TWO
“Carlisle
Tenants` and Residents` Federation in
the past has criticised the limitations of the Panel`s scrutiny role when
reports from Riverside Housing Association are discussed. The Federation has
also criticised the Panel`s very limited
allowance of oral questioning by taxpayers.
“In
the spirit of the Panel`s new wider remit as referred to in the previous
question, will the Panel now please move
to further increased scrutiny and questioning
to emulate the excellent work of parliamentary select committees.
“This
question partly arises from what the Federation
was previously told by the
council i.e. that the basis of the work
of the Panel is founded on the work of these select committees and that
nationally all local government overview and scrutiny bodies are the local
government equivalent of these committees,”
CarlisleTenants`
and Residents` Federation publishes this blog. Information about the
Federation is available on 01228 522277 or 01228 532803.
No comments:
Post a Comment