UNEARTHING HISTORY FROM FORGOTTEN SCRAP BOOKS

More community
memories for Pat`s
garden village

Several family scrap books have been unearthed in forgotten drawers at home, and many hand-written histories re-discovered since Pat Hitchon set off  to write the story of the village of Botcherby, Carlisle.      

These journeys into the past have also yielded dozens of photos, notes, and archives. The number of people who have come forward with these half-forgotten items is now  well over 50.

Next week,  Pat will   be  making another monthly report on her progress  to members of the Botcherby Forever  community group who have helped her for almost a year with their memories.

The meeting will be held in a new venue, a venue which is itself very much part of the Botcherby story, St Andrew`s Church(pictured above) in Wood Street. The street is Georgian and is also listed.

The  church  itself  is not so old,  dating from 1880. Photos of  vacant ground being blessed before the church was built are among the Botcherby  historic items handed to Pat recently.

Today, St Andrews is facing  problems, similar to all churches, caused by falling attendances.

The Rev Steve Donald who has charge of the church, talked about these problems at the last meeting of Botcherby Forever.

He said it is now  planned to alter the inside of the church by removing the organ and using that space as a community meeting place.

Possibly, Botcherby Forever will use that space in future.  The group is badly in need of a permanent venue for its  meetings. In  not much more than a year, the group has been forced to meet in four different venues.

Pat`s book is to have the title”Botcherby—a Garden Village” and is due to be published next year. The Botcherby Forever community group is part of Carlisle Tenants` and Residents` Federation.

Community Voice Carlisle is the blog of Carlisle Tenants` and Residents `Federation. Information about the Federation is contained in the first entry of this blog, dated March 25 2013.

FREEDOM...TO DO MUCH AS RIVERSIDE SEES FIT

Freedom of Information is serving Carlisle badly says a community group, because it does not  include housing associations.

These organisations do whatever they  see fit because they don`t have to answer questions about their operations in a democratic way as they would if they were covered  by the Freedom of Information Act.

Riverside Housing Association is the latest association to fail  to answer questions when it demolished 16 flats in Borland Avenue, Botcherby. Carlisle, says a Letter  to the Editor today from Carlisle Tenants` and Residents` Federation. The letter is to the News and Star, Carlisle.

Here it is:

A dark shadow remains over Carlisle despite the very welcome spotlight shone by your newspaper on the Freedom of Information Act.
T
he News and Star  did a great public service with its spotlight. But sadly, many people will conclude that the Freedom of Information Act serves Carlisle  badly.

Badly, because  housing associations- the biggest landlords in Carlisle- are unlike other public bodies : they don`t  do Freedom of Information,  the Act does not include housing associations.

Nationally, some of these housing associations  are also big

and powerful .One of the biggest in the country, Riverside
owns 50,000 homes nationwide. About ten per cent of these
are in Carlisle, and this Carlisle holding gives Riverside a near-monopoly of the city`s social housing.

It also gives Riverside very similar powers  to the city council in running

the  housing estates.

On these estates, the council  has a good record in dealing with information under the Act. But Riverside is under no such legal obligation. Nor is Riverside very ready to explain what it is  up to on these estates.

Riverside has a freedom in Carlisle denied to the council-  freedom to act much as it sees fit.

A couple of weeks ago in Botcherby,  Riverside demolished 16 one-bedroom maisonette flats in Borland Avenue. Before the demolition, there were protests  from a local councillor, from Botcherby people,  and from a protesting petition.

Riverside said it had consulted these people. But  this consultation never included an explanation of why the demolition had to go ahead despite the protests and despite the city shortage of one bedroom accommodation, made worse by the bedroom tax.

Riverside never explained because it didn`t have to explain.

A  Freedom of Information request would have forced an explanation

There have been several similar Riverside demolitions over the last few years in other parts of the city. Sheltered accommodatation  and old people`s bungalows have gone . And  like the Botcherby demolitions,, the reason why they have gone  has never been explained by Riverside.

Riverside`s unexplained demolitions have been challenged repeatedly, particularly by the tenants` and residents` organisation, Carlisle Tenants` and Residents` Federation.

But such challenges are easily brushed  aside by an organisation that has the freedom to do exactly what it thinks fit.

One hundred years ago, Carlisle council also had the freedom to do what  it thought fit,.But, unlike Riverside, it did it in a democratic way which it was prepared to explain. What  the council thought fit  to do 100 years ago was to start building council houses..

Down those 100 years the council also  thought  fit to continue building until  9,000 homes  were created and Carlisle was doubled in size through a handful of newly-created council estates.

Ten years ago, all this ended with the takeover of the city council houses by the giant Liverpool organisation, Riverside.

Riverside`s unexplained demolitions and other unexplained measures- all of them, no doubt, decided  in a what-we-think-fit  way in Liverpool -are now changing for ever what the city council created  during a century of democratic government.

Freedom of Information would force Riverside to explain these unexplained demolitions and tell us what is going on.

Carlisle people who built these estates through their rates and taxes have right to know what is going on.

Community Voice Carlisle is the blog of Carlisle Tenants` and Residents` Federation. Information abourt the Fededration is  contained in the first post of this blog, dated March 25 2013

DID SOMEONE MENTION DEMOCRACY?

TENANTS PROTEST

BUT WHO IS LISTENING?

Two protesting groups are  joining forces here, outside the derelict site that once had on it sixteen one-bedroom maisonette flats.

The flats are in Borland Avenue. Botcherby, Carlisle, and were demolished a few days ago by the giant Riverside Housing Association.

One of the protesting groups is campaigning to end the government`s bedroom tax which has massively increased the demand for one-bedroom accommodation, such as the demolished flats.

The other protesting group is campaigning to halt the continued demolition  by Riverside of one-bedroom accommodation throughout Carlisle.

This demolition has gone on for several years and there are now no  one-bedroom replacements, despite increased demand.

The anti-bedroom tax group plans to take its protest to M.P.s, to Parliament, and if necessary to David Cameron in Downing Street. This protest is democracy at work.

The anti-demolition group plans to take its protest to....where? Where can the anti-demolition protesters go? They have no democratic process. Democracy has been denied.

And no one seems to be listening. Not even the local councillors. Only one of the three Botcherby councillors has spoken out against the demolition. And if they did  happen to speak out, what good would it do?

Robert Betton, the one Botcherby  councillor who is listening

said: "A petition with 400 signatures failed to stop the demolition of these flats. Riverside didn`t properly consult the people of Botcherby who are now even more short of one-bedroom accommodation.

 "Now we must let the rest of Carlisle know what has happened to these flats so that they are prepared to take a stand against any further demolitions by Riverside.”

Carlisle Tenants` and Residents` Federation supports the  protesting people of Botcherby. The Federation has campaigned for  several years for the Liverpool-based Riverside organisation to  be open and democratic and be properly accountable to all residents of the city estates.

Community View Carlisle is the blog of Carlisle Tenants` and Residents` Federation.  Information about the Federation is contained in the first post of this blog, dated March 25 2013

NO OPTION FOR US SAY PROTESTING 400

WHY DEMOLISH THE

FLATS WE WANT?

Protests and a petition failed to save 16 one-bedroom maisonette flats in  Borland Avenue, Botcherby, Carlisle  seen here being pulled down by Riverside Housing Association.

One- bedroom social housing such as this  is  desperately short in the city –  sixty per cent of all  applicants want one-bedroom. And the bedroom tax has made the shortage worse.

Botcherby councillor, Robert Betton who organised the protests and the  petition says:”Why demolish the flats we want?.

“These flats are  being pulled down without proper consultation - the Botcherby people who wanted to keep them  have been ignored,” he says.

Robert also wants to know why no investment was made in the flats during the recent Botcherby Regeneration Scheme. He also wants to know  when  Riverside will end its policy of demolishing  one-bedroom social houses throughout Carlisle.

Riverside, a giant organisation based in Liverpool , will build  eleven two and three-bedroom houses on the site of the flats. ”This is the best option for the area”, says Riverside in its newsletter.

The 400 people who signed the petition don`t agree –emphatically. They say they have been ignored by Riverside. Now they say. ”Demolition is an option decided by Riverside We had no option.”

Community Voice Carlisle says: This is another Riverside decision  about the future of a Carlisle community made a hundred miles away in Liverpool. These decisions should be made democratically in Carlisle and  local people  should be properly consulted.

The Carlisle  activists group, Axe the Bedroom Tax, plan a demonstration outside the flats  next Tuesday (August 20) at 12 noon.

Community Voice Carlisle is the blog of Carlisle Tenants` and Residents `Federation.  Information about the Federation is contained in the first blog, dated March 25.

GOOGLE BOSS GOES HOUSE HUNTING

A ROYAL-FRIENDLY

“SEARCH ENGINE”

HOMELESS SINGLES

CANNOT MATCH

The boss of Google is looking for a place to live in London. Within his budget, you understand. The budget is £30 million, according to a Press report.

Three  hundred miles away in Carlisle, the prospects for a new home are much less rosy-  just about 30 million times less rosy- for several hundred people at the other end of the wealth scale. These people also want a home. But they have no budget.

The Google boss, the chairman Mr Eric Schmidt,  is a billionaire. The Carlisle home-seekers-   bachelors, widows, newly-divorced and pensioners - will never be able to buy even  the cheapest house. And they are forced to live alone.

Mr Schmidt, head of the world`s biggest search engine, is searching for a mansion in upmarket Chelsea or Holland Park. Helping him in his search is a friend of Prince William, Thomas Van Straubenzee, a  partner  in a well-connected London estate agency.

The Carlisle home-seekers have no Royal friends. Their “friend” is based 100 miles away in Liverpool where the big Carlisle decisions are made. The “friend” is the giant Riverside Housing Association which owns 50,000 properties, 6,000 of them in Carlisle.

The Carlisle home-seekers rely on Riverside -   and just about only on Riverside - to get them a home.

Sadly, Riverside cannot help with new  single-bedroom homes the home-seekers want. Riverside has stopped building homes for single people and for several years has been demolishing single homes.

Instead, Riverside is  building two and three-bedroom houses.These houses  apparently are more profitable.

Many of the Carlisle single home-seekers were among 400 concerned people who signed a petition urging Riverside to change its policy. They want to halt the demolition of 18 one-bedroom flats in Borland Avenue, Botcherby and replacing them with eleven “more profitable”  two and three bedroom  homes

And they want open democratic discussions about Riverside`s unpopular policies. Not decisions made without proper consultation.

Down in London, Mr Schmidt`s Royal-friendly “search engine”  continued to download suggestions for the £30 million mansion he wants to buy.

Here in Carlisle, the Borland Avenue petition was turned down. And contractors started to knock down the 18 flats.

Community Voice, Carlisle is the blog of Carlisle Tenants` and Residents` Federation. Information about the Federation is contained in the first blog , dated March 25 2013

LOCALISM GOES COMMERCIAL

HAVE YOU BEEN

KIDDING COMMUNITIES

MR CAMERON?

David Cameron made big play during the last election about his support for local communities. Localism was the buzz word and sure enough, localism is now steaming ahead.

Or is it?

The latest  backing  for localism came this week in a government scheme called Community Cashback offering grants to local groups to start  small services such as grass cutting, cleaning or  property repairs.

Localism gets strong support in Cumbria, mainly though much-admired pioneering work by Mr Rory Stewart, M.P. for Penrith and the Border.

But Carlisle gets no localism. Worse than  that, support for it is in retreat. And that worries community groups which are now struggling to find venues to discuss their problems

Carlisle Tenants` and Residents` Federation and its associated group, Carlisle South Community Association, are typical…. uncertain about how long they will continue to have the use of the friendly Family Church  in Petteril Bank.The two groups have had free use  for about twenty years. But now, the church has closed.

And in nearby Botcherby, a group run by the Federation-Botcherby Forever- is homeless for the second time in not much more than a year because community premises  have  been closed down.

A year ago, Botcherby Forever lost the Crown Social Club which closed. The group`s home since then has been the Botcherby Healthy Living Centre run by a kind and friendly organisation. Now that building has been closed  after more than 30 years as a community centre.

Why is all this happening in Carlisle? Much of the blame lies with  the city`s principal landlord, the giant Riverside Housing Association of Liverpool. Over recent  years, Riverside has closed  down  nearly all the city`s long-established community groups.

Riverside doesn`t like community groups-except its  favourite groups. The favourite community groups get Riverside cash and other support. Other groups  get nothing.

And Riverside is also very commercially-minded  with  its community property . One  property in Welsh Road, Petteril Bank,  has been put on the market.

The centre once was  four council flats. Riverside converted them into a community job creation centre and fitted  it out  with a lavish array of computers. But nothing got off the ground and efforts by community groups to use the centre when it became vacant have been ignored.

Now the centre is empty again. An estate agent`s sign on the property says:”To let for commercial use.”

That  estate agent`s sign, Mr Cameron, says all you need to know about localism in Petteril Bank, Carlisle.

Localism, Mr Cameron?

Have you been kidding?

COMMUNITY VOICE, CARLISLE  is the blog of Carlisle Tenants` and Residents` Federation. Information about the Federation  is included in the first entry of the blog, dated March 25 2013

THE RACE TO BECOME WORST IN THE COUNTRY

WHO CARES FOR

FRIGHTENED

TENANTS?

What is the next organisation in Carlisle to be  judged among the worst in  the country following this judgement in a damning report on the Cumberland Infirmary  by Sir Bruce Keogh?

Not  many months ago there was a similar report –this time by Ofsted--about the two Carlisle Academy schools. The report  put these schools among the worst in the country.

Today, there is a third report. This time it is about the Carlisle housing organisation, the giant  Riverside Housing Association.Sadly, this report has not  the weight of  Sir Bruce Keogh behind it, nor  has it the nationwide authority of Ofsted .

This third report is simply based  on what took place at a meeting of about a dozen people that lasted under an hour.It was prepared by Carlisle Tenants` and Residents`Federation. And this report came to the same conclusion as Sir Bruce and Ofsted. It concluded that Riverside is among the worst housing associations in the country.

The meeting hadn`t a good start.The dozen or so attending were cramped like sardines into the lounge of one of the flats of Dixon`s Court, Shaddongate.( Riverside don`t cater for tenants` meetings. And previous funding for tenants groups to hold such meetings  was  cut off without any reason when Riverside took over the  council houses ten years ago)

The Dixon`s Court tenants called the meeting because they are  so worried about the standard of care by Riverside that they barricade themselves in at night following the imprisonment of two of the tenants, one for raping a 14 year old girl and the other for drug offences.

Two Riverside executives attended the meeting. But what they had to say offered  no help to the anxious tenants.

***The executives would not talk about any problems in the past, such as why  Riverside withdrew its cash community help for such groups as Dixon`s Court.

***The executives  had no answer to the many criticisms of  Riverside`s  tenant allocation policy of mixing old people and young people together which leads to explosive relationships.

***The executives appeared  to have no proper appreciation of Riverside`s duty of care to its  tenants . Any duty of care appeared to end at 5 pm when Riverside staff finished work.And  any duty of care appeared to be a police problem.

Perish the thought that it was Riverside that had a duty of care to frightened  tenants.

The  government has ordered special measures for the Cumberland Infirmary  and for the Academy Schools.

Special measures for Riverside to help the frightened tenants of Dixon`s Court cannot come quickly enough.