Tuesday, 3 December 2019

COUNCILLORS ATTACK "PRESENT HOUSING SYSTEMS"


City housing move to get back on top

Image result for council houses pictures 
Things are moving in Britain`s former social housing star local authority, Carlisle.

The city`s return to stardom may not be far off because two decades on, building council houses is again on its agenda.
 
Building council houses is now to be considered  by the  city council  following a successful motion by two  councillors backed up by 12 colleagues

The motion had echoes of Carlisle`s former  star status.  There was also similar echoes in  supporting speeches by the  two councillors - Councillor Lisa Brown and her Denton Holme colleague Ruth Alcroft.

Councillor Lisa Brown (PenPic)
Coun Brown... recalled start of counci housing

 Ruth is  also Carlisle`s Labour candidate in  next week`s election.

The star status was gained in the  the years between the wars when the city,  proportionate to its population, had the best record  in Britain for building council houses.

The two councillors recalled that the year 2019 marks the 100th anniversary of the Addison Act, the act which marked the creation of council housing.

The act made housing a national responsibility and local authorities were given the job of developing new housing where it was needed by working people. But fifty years later things changed dramatically when tenants  were given a right to buy their homes.

Then came what the two councillors called  “present housing systems”. This they attacked.

 In the attack, the councillors   did not specify which “system” they had in mind. But in Carlisle there is little doubt that  the city`s biggest landlord, the Liverpool- based giant housing association, Riverside, owner of 55.000 homes nationwide best fits that description

Riverside took over the city`s 7,000  council houses 17 years ago and has been criticised many times since.

This what the two councillors said about “present housing systems”(or Riverside if you prefer it):

“Present housing systems respond poorly to life events such as relationship breakdown, job insecurity and the onset of poor health and caring responsibilities.

“Low rents, such as council house rents make an important contribution to reducing the degree of housing cost -induced poverty and material deprivation among tenants.”

Carlisle Tenants` and Residents` Federation which publishes this blog joins the two councillors in their crtiticism of “ present housing systems.”

The Federation has no problem in naming Riverside as the Carlisle organisation which best fits  that description.
  
The Federation has also no problem  in adding to the two councillors` criticism .
.
A spokesman said  “The right to buy policy   was largely responsible for the present housing crisis.  Right to buy gave us remote  dictatorial and grossly inefficient organisations like Riverside  which is responsible to no one but itself.
.
 “Congratulations  to councillors Brown and Alcroft  for their campaigning. And congratulations to Carlisle city council in its  newly-found  support for council house building and the happy prospect of a new era of social housing.

“Hopefully soon, Carlisle will once again be top".



Carlisle Tenants` and Residents` Federation publishes this blog. Information about the Federation is available on 01228 522277

Thursday, 14 November 2019

CAUTIONARY TALE ALERT BY FORMER HOUSING BOSS


Riverside
takeover: a
warning to all

A stinging attack has been launched against the housing organisation behind the fat -cat salary row at Workington.

Mr Adrian Waite a former Workington housing boss warns of the dangers of a new agreement for tenants in the town  which is planned by  Riverside Housing Association of Liverpool,  a giant  organisation which owns 56,000 homes nationwide.

Housing organisations and tenants in other parts of the country should take note, says Mr Waite  head of  Appleby-based  AWICS, a management consultancy and training company.

The warning comes a year after Riverside took over the much smaller Impact Housing Association which is based in Workington and has 2,770  homes. Mr Waite was chairman of Impact for four years prior to the takeover which he criticised  at the time.

Now he has renewed his attack.

He writes in his blog:

“ Riverside and Impact have now decided  to make a ‘transfer of engagements’. This would mean that all Impact’s operations, including their housing stock, would move to Riverside and they would become the landlord.

“Impact was always more than `just a housing association’ and provided a wide range of other services including a community centre at Salterbeck in Workington; foyers in Kendal, Penrith and Whitehaven; a furniture service; and a domestic violence service.

“This approach is not consistent with Riverside’s business model so I also raised concerns about whether these services would continue to be provided. The response from Riverside’s representatives was rather vague. I would not be surprised if we see some services closed.

“You may be thinking that I am just having a moan.

” However, I think that this may be a cautionary tale for other housing associations and their tenants and that the Regulator of Social Housing should consider taking a different approach to regulation to ensure greater transparency and accountability especially when providers are downgraded or when mergers or takeovers are being considered.”

Mr Waite recalls that he was a member of the board of Impact  from 2009 to 2015 and was Chair from 2011 to 2015.   

He goes on:

“Throughout that time, Impact maintained a  top rating with the Regulator. However, in 2017, Impact was downgraded to a non-compliant and the Board proposed a ‘merger’ with the Riverside Group that could more accurately be described as a ‘takeover’.

“As a shareholding member of Impact, I was shocked at the way the board behaved, mainly because of:
  • Their mismanagement of Impact that led to the downgrade.
  • Their decision to bring forward the 2017 AGM to before the Regulator announced the downgrade so that they could tell members that Impact’s finances were ‘strong and stable’ contrary to the conclusions of the Regulator.
  • The agreement that they reached with Riverside failed to protect Impact’s values, services or tenants; and was supported by misleading information. It was also made without enough engagement with shareholding members or tenants.

“AT the Impact AGM in 2017  members were told the finances were 'strong and stable'. The following week the Regulator downgraded the association's rating for financial viability from the top  rating to a non-compliant  rating.

“I opposed the ‘takeover’ at the 2018 AGM, but it was approved.

“Interestingly enough, only a year after the ‘takeover’, everyone who was a member of the board of Impact prior to the downgrading has been replaced. Impact also has a new finance director.

“Both Riverside and the Impact board made great play at the time of the ‘takeover’ about how Impact would continue to act independently within the Riverside Group.

“Tenants were even told in writing that their landlord would not change. In view of Riverside’s highly centralised business model, I questioned this at the time.

“I asked whether Riverside planned to do with Impact what they had previously done with the Carlisle Housing Association – namely wind them up and integrate their homes and operations into the parent housing association.

 “I was assured by representatives of Riverside at the highest level that this would not happen.

“However, Riverside and Impact have now decided – only a year after the ‘takeover’ - to make a ‘transfer of engagements’. This would mean that all Impact’s operations, including their housing stock, would move to Riverside and they would become the landlord.”

What does Impact say?

In a letter to tenants earlier this month Impact said:

“As you will recall, Impact became a subsidiary of The Riverside Group in August 2018 following consultation with you and a positive vote from our shareholders.

“Joining Riverside has brought exciting changes to our operations across Cumbria. The move has enabled us to begin work on a multi-million pound programme to improve existing homes and to build new ones.

“As explained during our consultation with you in 2018, the plan was for Impact to initially become a subsidiary of Riverside with a view to explore further integration options towards the end of 2020.
“However, our financial position is not strong enough for us to continue as a stand alone subsidiary with the ability to deliver the commitments that both Impact and Riverside made during the consultation in 2018.
“We need to take action now to ensure that services and commitments to customers are not disrupted and to protect our staff.

 “The Impact Board has looked at a number of options and has agreed a proposal to begin integration into Riverside sooner than planned through a ‘transfer of engagements’. 
“This would mean that all our operations, including our housing stock, would move to Riverside and they would become your landlord.

"We believe this is the best option for you, our staff and the wider community. It would mean that:You can continue to live in the same home with services provided locally by the teams you already know.•
“Your tenancy / lease agreement will stay the same only the name of your landlord will change to The Riverside Group Limited. Your rights whether you are a tenant, shared owner or a leaseholder will be protected.
“Riverside will continueto deliver the pledges it made when Impact joined the Group, including the £25million programme to improve homes across Cumbria.
“We would keep the Impact Housing name as a separate brand within the Riverside Group. The current Impact Board will becomea sub-committee to the Riverside Group Board and will continue to act in the best interests of Impact customers.
“Rents are set to go up in April 2020 and this will happen right across the social housing sector. This means that your rent would still increase if you remained with Impact. A transfer to Riverside will have no effect on how much you pay for your home (see the enclosed question and answer document for more information).

“We are proposing that the Transfer of Engagements happens on or before 31 March 2020. Our shareholders will vote on the Board’s proposal in early 2020. We have informed the Government’s Regulator of Social Housing and they support our plans”.

 Last week there was much criticism of Riverside after the housing press  revealed that  Ms Carol Matthews, Chief Executive Officer  has won a  20 per cent mouth-watering salary  rise to £234, 563.
A spokesman for Carlisle Tenants` and Residents` Federation which publishes this blog said: 

No one is better qualified than Mr Waite to criticise Riverside and its authoritarian ways.“He is a respected professional housing and local government consultant and additionally  had several years of experience working on the Impact governing board. .
“Many of his criticisms  have also been levelled  by the Federation during the years of campaigning against Riverside`s bossiness and gross inefficiency in Carlisle since it took over the city council houses in 2002. Riverside is accountable to no-one but itself
“His warning of the dangers ahead should not be ignored.”

Monday, 4 November 2019

OUTRAGE AT FAT CAT 20 PER CENT RISE


Workington Man and `envious` Boris? 
'Workington man'
The Cumbria town of  Workington that has hit the national headlines by giving its name to  a crucial swing voter  has been making news for another reason.

The housing press  reveals that  the boss of the town`s  housing association has won a  mouth-watering salary  of nearly a quarter of a million pounds.

The name Workington Man is claimed  to be the key to success of the Tories at the polls next month- the name came from a think tank called Onward which identified him as an older white male from the north of England.

But  what exactly Workington Man  made of that gigantic salary increase-   up more than 20 per cent on the year and fifty per cent more than Boris`s pay- is not known.We can only guess.  

The massive rise to £234,563  will take a lot of explaining say critics.

The rise has been won by Ms Carol Matthews chief executive of  the giant Riverside Housing Association which led a controversial takeover of the much smaller Workington-based Impact Housing Association almost exactly a year ago.   

Takeover time: Ms Matthews(left) and former Impact chairman, Mark Costello

That takeover came about  after the social housing regulator downgraded Impact as not fit for purpose because of its failings in governance and viability.

Impact was accused of secrecy, spin, lack of transparency and failure to properly consult tenants.A former Impact chairman Mr Adrian Waite, a leading  local government management consultant made the criticisms in  letter to the then community secretary Mr Sajid Javid.  

One year on and critics say that Ms Matthews` mouth-watering salary has also not been properly explained. Liverpool-based Riverside which has 56,000  homes nationwide did make a statement about the salary to  the social housing magazine Inside Housing which has just completed a survey of 156 housing association`s chief executives.

The survey revealed that Ms Matthews`  near quarter million pay rise was the third highest of the 156 and the average pay rise of the 156 was £174,896.                                                                                                  
The Riverside statement said:“Ms Matthews’ salary was increased in January 2019 as a result of changes to the organisation’s senior leadership team and to bring it closer in line with market rates for comparable roles in the sector.

“Carol is a highly respected leader, responsible for a large, complex national housing and care business with an annual turnover of £354 million.

“She personally chose to be paid less than her predecessor when she joined Riverside as chief executive in February 2012 and since then her salary has remained, and still remains, one of the lowest in the sector compared to the leaders of similar sized housing providers.”

 This is not the first time that Riverside has been criticised for the fat cat salaries paid to its bosses says Carlisle Tenants` and Residents` Federation,  which for many years has campaigned to hold Riverside to account. The Federation publishes this blog.

A spokesman for the Federation said today: “Not many years ago we  and others drew attention to these outrageous Riverside salaries. So it is  not surprising that Riverside now praises Ms Matthews for chosing to work for a reduced salary.

 “ Her predecessors were not so restrained and  because of that they came in for a lot of criticism.

“Riverside may now think that  Ms Matthews`salary -a 20 per cent pay rise to nearly a quarter of million pounds a year - is low. 

"Workington Man would say that`s crazy!

"Boris must be very envious!”

Carlisle Tenants` and Residents` Federation publishes this blog. Information about the Federation is available on 01228 5222